By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — Thousands of babies are born alive each year after attempted abortions. These abortion survivors expose abortion for what it is, the death of a child. They also present a big legal problem for abortionists since the law generally treats born-alive children as legal “persons” with legal and constitutional rights.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — In an interview with America magazine, Pope Francis stated that Catholic teaching is unclear on personhood of the pre-born child. The truth is, the teaching of the Catholic Church on pre-born Personhood is crystal clear.
By Deborah Riffenburgh— We first let you know about PCHETA, the Senate’s dangerous palliative care bill, in December, 2019. Thanks to your phone calls and emails, the bill was removed from the US Senate HELP Committee’s agenda. Now it is back. You helped stop this bill before—it’s time to do it again.
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — What is a person? We need an answer to the question of personhood for any intelligent discussion of abortion, because all human persons have a fundamental right to life.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — Even before the Dobbs decision, state-wide referendums on abortion have always attracted massive amounts of political donations from abortionists, as well as a barrage of pro-abortion unpaid propaganda from the mainstream media. As a result, things almost always turn out badly for the pro-life side. Case in point: The recent defeat of the Value Them Both Amendment in Kansas… It’s time to shift the tide.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — Dobbs v. Jackson overturned Roe and Casey and sent abortion back to the states, but should the right to life be a political question?
By Deborah Riffenburgh — Today, as America celebrates the founding of our great nation and the liberties we enjoy, let us remember our military brothers and sisters who remain in the trenches, fighting for religious freedom from mandated COVID vaccines. One soldier’s battle against these mandates is a costly one for his career and for his family.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — With the fall of Roe v. Wade imminent, it’s time to unite the fractured pro-life movement around its core principle—equal protection, without exception.
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — It is encouraging to hear that the Supreme Court, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization, may finally overturn Roe v Wade. However, that will not be enough to protect the pre-born, because the Court’s decision just transfers the abortion issue to the states where, in many cases, abortion will be expanded.
By Deborah Riffenburgh — Across America, thousands of pro-life Christian service members are being persecuted and purged from the military for refusing to accept an abortion-derived COVID vaccine. Even though we ask these men and women to put their lives on the line to protect our fundamental rights, including our religious freedom, our government is denying theirs. What does this mean for our military? For our nation?
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate, through OSHA, conflicts with the fundamental structure of American government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in hearing oral arguments surrounding the vaccine mandate, is likely to address at least four main points against it.
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate, through OSHA, conflicts with the fundamental structure of American government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in hearing oral arguments surrounding the vaccine mandate, is likely to address at least four main points against it.
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — Aside from the legal arguments made in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health hearing at the U.S. Supreme Court, three themes emerged that reveal the deep moral corruption of the pro-abortion movement.
By Deborah Riffenburgh — Many of our supporters followed the case of Ryan Magers, a father who sued on behalf of his pre-born child who was killed through abortion. A year ago, on October 30, 2020, Magers lost his final battle in the Alabama Supreme Court. However, the case was historic, not only in the fight for recognition of fathers’ rights, but in the struggle to re-establish legal personhood of the pre-born.
By David Bjornstrom — On December 1, the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health, which will necessitate a revisiting of some of the Court’s most notorious abortion decisions. The stakes are high, with more than 170 legal briefs already filed by both pro-life and pro-abortion groups. So what exactly is each side arguing in the Dobbs case?
By Deborah Riffenburgh — In direct response to the recently passed Texas Heartbeat Act, a new bill was proposed in Pennsylvania that would limit the number of children that men could father and mandate forced sterilization. The so-called parody legislation could easily be laughed off as absurd, but closer examination reveals a more disturbing truth.
By Deborah Riffenburgh — People across our nation are being faced with an impossible choice – violate their sincerely held religious beliefs by taking an abortion-derived COVID-19 injection, or lose their livelihoods, their careers, and their opportunity for education. How can we, as Christians, take a principled stand as we navigate COVID-19 vaccine mandates, which are an unprecedented attack on our civil and religious liberties? Here are some practical resources and tools we hope will help.
By Deborah Riffenburgh — The Texas Heartbeat Act has caused chaos in the abortion industry and wild celebration in the pro-life movement. But what exactly is in the law, why did the Supreme Court refuse to obstruct it, and will temporary gains bring long-term protection to pre-born children in Texas?
By David Bjornstrom — The U.S. Supreme Court’s viability standard in Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey will be tested this fall in the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization case. The Dobbs case involves a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks. While the case does not go far enough, in that it still allows abortions at all, it highlights the absurdity of the Court’s viability standard.
By Deborah Riffenburgh — The CONNECT for Health Act of 2021 proposes expanding the use of telehealth across America. While this will make healthcare more accessible, imprecise language in the legislation may enable assisted suicide remotely, even in states where it’s illegal, putting an already vulnerable population at further risk.