By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — In partnership with the center for Reproductive Rights and the last abortion facility in the state, the American Medical Association is suing North Dakota to block two informed consent laws related to the personhood of pre-born children and the abortion pill reversal protocol.
By guest blogger Bill Fortenberry — Marshae Jones has been indicted by a grand jury for felony manslaughter in the death of her prenatal child, who was shot and killed during a fight between Jones and another woman. The key to understanding the indictment in this case is to recognize that, under Alabama law, a prenatal child has the same legal protections as a born child.
By Sarah Quale — During a press conference at its headquarters this morning, Personhood Alliance affiliate Georgia Right to Life denounced Netflix, Disney, Warner Media, CBS, Sony, and others who are threatening to stop work in the state if the Georgia heartbeat law is allowed to take effect. Georgia Right to Life is uniting Georgia pro-lifers against the Hollywood attacks and pursuing efforts to protect all pre-born children equally, without exceptions.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,— Last weekend, President Trump tweeted out his personal position on abortion. Many in the pro-life movement, including the Personhood Alliance, were disappointed that the president endorsed the continued killing of innocent children conceived in rape and incest. However, the president also called for unity among pro-lifers. I believe that unity can be achieved by actually allowing the moral vs. political conflict to continue. Allow me to explain…
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,—What is legal personhood? It is the cornerstone of our fundamental human rights, but what does it look like, and why is its impact so catastrophic for the culture of death?
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq., — The mainstream media and the Marxist left (please excuse the redundancy) are in a frenzy as one American state after another is rejecting one of the most fundamental sacraments of their political ideology: The “right” to kill innocent pre-born children through abortion-on-demand. In the coverage surrounding the passage of the most recent bills—Ohio, Kentucky, Georgia, and Alabama—the word personhood is being tossed around quite a bit by both friend and foe. So, do these bills secure equal protection under the law for all pre-born humans?
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,— Those who support abortion are increasingly more willing to believe a Hollywood-fiction portrayal of things that will never come to be, instead of the reality and brutality of abortion. This substitution of intellectual honesty with uncritical party loyalty bodes badly for America. For as President Lincoln stated, quoting the Bible, a house divided cannot stand.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,— The Wisconsin Assembly and Senate currently have two anti-infanticide bills that exempt the mother from prosecution if she kills her child born alive after a failed abortion attempt. On April 17, 2019, the Personhood Alliance submitted a legal memo to the Wisconsin State Legislature on behalf of its affiliate, Pro-Life Wisconsin, outlining the problems with this exemption.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,— A heated debate took place yesterday on CNN between Rick Santorum and Chris Cuomo that exemplifies why personhood is at the heart of the battle to end abortion. The topic of conversation for the segment was supposed to be the passage of yet another heartbeat law, but it quickly spiraled into a discussion of judicial supremacy, the rule of law, and the personhood of the pre-born child.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,—On Tuesday, March 26th, the Trump administration threw down the gauntlet on George Soros and the globalist abortion lobby when it announced that it would expand the Mexico City policy and start to implement the Siljander Amendment. This Amendment was put in place in 1981 to ensure no U.S. foreign aid would be used to lobby for abortion, but it was never implemented…until now.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.— There is a false premise at the heart of the argument for morally compromised legislation. It is simply not true that rejecting the exceptions for the “difficult” cases means that we do nothing. Those of us who reject exception-laden legislation are often described as cutting off our nose to spite our face, tilting at windmills, making the perfect the enemy of the possible, etc. However, legislative agendas are never a binary choices. We don’t have to choose between cooperating with evil and our ultimate goal of the complete abolition of abortion.
WASHINGTON, DC, March 18, 2019; For immediate release—The Personhood Alliance board of directors voted unanimously on March 7, 2019, to accept the applications of new affiliates in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Nebraska, raising the number of its affiliate organizations to 19, with three more state applicants currently under consideration. “The Personhood Alliance is growing because we are unapologetic about our worldview and our goals,” says Personhood Alliance president Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq…
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.— If this case is successful, Alabama could punish abortion clinics and pharmaceutical companies under its wrongful death law to prevent them from continuing to profit from the killing of pre-born children…
Published with permission from the Human Preservation blog, February 25, 2019, by Christopher M. Reilly—Time has run out for casual debates over the morality of human genetic editing…
By Sarah Quale, president of Personhood Alliance Education—In their zeal to protect “abortion access,” Democrats inadvertently forced a change in our national conversation that has cast a very unfavorable light on their position. Not only do these legislative efforts support infanticide, they expose a commonly misunderstood exception for abortion that we now have the opportunity to completely and unequivocally dismantle—the “life and health of the mother” argument…
