Political

Draft Roe v Wade decision falls short

By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — It is encouraging to hear that the Supreme Court, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization, may finally overturn Roe v Wade. However, that will not be enough to protect the pre-born, because the Court’s decision just transfers the abortion issue to the states where, in many cases, abortion will be expanded.

Continue Reading

COVID vaccines: Purging pro-life Christians from the U.S. military

By Deborah Stilt — Across America, thousands of pro-life Christian service members are being persecuted and purged from the military for refusing to accept an abortion-derived COVID vaccine. Even though we ask these men and women to put their lives on the line to protect our fundamental rights, including our religious freedom, our government is denying theirs. What does this mean for our military? For our nation?

Continue Reading

Making sense of the COVID vaccine mandate hearing at SCOTUS

By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate, through OSHA, conflicts with the fundamental structure of American government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in hearing oral arguments surrounding the vaccine mandate, is likely to address at least four main points against it.

Continue Reading

Dobbs case exposes moral bankruptcy of abortion industry

By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — Aside from the legal arguments made in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health hearing at the U.S. Supreme Court, three themes emerged that reveal the deep moral corruption of the pro-abortion movement.

Continue Reading

Wilkes County, NC, becomes third Safe County for pre-born children

By Deborah Stilt — On Tuesday, November 2, 2021, Wilkes County commissioners voted unanimously to protect pre-born children from abortion as part of the Personhood Alliance’s Safe Cities and Counties initiative, becoming the third county in the nation to do so. This was the first step in a unique three-phased approach that empowers citizens to take control at the local level and peacefully defy the unjust ruling of Roe v. Wade.

Continue Reading

Remembering Baby Roe and the fight for fathers’ rights

By Deborah Stilt — Many of our supporters followed the case of Ryan Magers, a father who sued on behalf of his pre-born child who was killed through abortion. A year ago, on October 30, 2020, Magers lost his final battle in the Alabama Supreme Court.  However, the case was historic, not only in the fight for recognition of fathers’ rights, but in the struggle to re-establish legal personhood of the pre-born.

Continue Reading

Life or death: Pro-life and pro-abortion arguments in the Dobbs case

By David Bjornstrom — On December 1, the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health, which will necessitate a revisiting of some of the Court’s most notorious abortion decisions. The stakes are high, with more than 170 legal briefs already filed by both pro-life and pro-abortion groups. So what exactly is each side arguing in the Dobbs case?

Continue Reading

“Parody” bill proposes forced sterilization, but is it a joke?

By Deborah Stilt — In direct response to the recently passed Texas Heartbeat Act, a new bill was proposed in Pennsylvania that would limit the number of children that men could father and mandate forced sterilization. The so-called parody legislation could easily be laughed off as absurd, but closer examination reveals a more disturbing truth.

Continue Reading

Practical tools for standing up to COVID-19 vaccine mandates

By Deborah Stilt — People across our nation are being faced with an impossible choice – violate their sincerely held religious beliefs by taking an abortion-derived COVID-19 injection, or lose their livelihoods, their careers, and their opportunity for education. How can we, as Christians, take a principled stand as we navigate COVID-19 vaccine mandates, which are an unprecedented attack on our civil and religious liberties? Here are some practical resources and tools we hope will help.

Continue Reading

The good, bad, and ugly of the Texas Heartbeat Act

By Deborah Stilt — The Texas Heartbeat Act has caused chaos in the abortion industry and wild celebration in the pro-life movement. But what exactly is in the law, why did the Supreme Court refuse to obstruct it, and will temporary gains bring long-term protection to pre-born children in Texas?

Continue Reading

COVID-19 vaccine mandates are medically futile, likely illegal (Part 3)

By Dr. Alan Moy — Mandating an experimental COVID-19 vaccine represents a medically futile, and likely illegal, public-health effort to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. It is immoral, and likely illegal, for schools, workplaces, and hospitals to require young and healthy individuals to take an experimental drug that offers no personal benefit, but instead, poses serious health risks. Here’s what you can do to push back against this tide.

Continue Reading

COVID-19 vaccine mandates are medically futile, likely illegal (Part 2)

By Dr. Alan Moy — It is critical that individuals are informed as to the actual risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines. Unfortunately, the efficacy of the vaccines has been overstated and the hazards, understated. They are essentially security blankets, lending people a sense of comfort, but in reality, providing incomplete and unsatisfactory protection from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 

Continue Reading

COVID-19 vaccine mandates are medically futile, likely illegal (Part 1)

By Dr. Alan Moy — Despite what our public health authorities assert, the efficacy of Operation Warp Speed COVID-19 vaccines is inferior to that of natural immunity. Yet, the COVID-19 vaccines approved under the FDA’s emergency use authorization are the subject of mandates and unprecedented measures of coercion. These efforts are medically futile, and possibly illegal. Here’s why.

Continue Reading

Is Roe v Wade on a Collision Course?

By David Bjornstrom — The U.S. Supreme Court’s viability standard in Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey will be tested this fall in the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization case. The Dobbs case involves a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks. While the case does not go far enough, in that it still allows abortions at all, it highlights the absurdity of the Court’s viability standard.

Continue Reading

Death via Zoom: Assisted suicide and telehealth

By Deborah Stilt — The CONNECT for Health Act of 2021 proposes expanding the use of telehealth across America. While this will make healthcare more accessible, imprecise language in the legislation may enable assisted suicide remotely, even in states where it’s illegal, putting an already vulnerable population at further risk.

Continue Reading

Abortion Is Unconstitutional and Not a State Issue

By David Bjornstrom — We concede too much in assuming that, if Roe vs. Wade is overturned, the individual states should decide whether or not to outlaw abortion. If unborn babies are “persons,” as modern science shows, the 14th Amendment outlaws abortion, since abortion deprives a class of persons of their life without due process of law and without equal protection. It is time to reclaim the 14th Amendment for the unborn.

Continue Reading

“It Cuts Like a Knife”: The Dismissal of Mary Wagner’s case by the Canadian Supreme Court

By Dr. Charles Lugosi, SJD — Editor’s note: The Canadian Supreme Court has refused to hear a case launched by Mary Wagner, a pro-life activist who was arrested for engaging in an act to save the lives of unborn children at a Toronto abortion facility in 2012. Mary’s goal was for the Court to agree that abortion kills a human being—a fundamental question of national importance. But the Court rejected the opportunity to put an end to the deaths of the unborn.

Continue Reading

The Value Them Both amendment protects abortion in Kansas

By Deborah Stilt — The well-intentioned Value Them Both amendment in Kansas (HCR5003) is heading to the primary ballot, and if passed, will amend the Kansas constitution. But many don’t realize that this amendment fails to protect pre-born babies and their mothers and instead, expressly grants the ability to regulate abortion, further enshrining it into law. While HCR5003 greatly misses the mark, there is a solution that would, in fact, “value both”—a personhood amendment.

Continue Reading

Is Amy Coney Barrett a Threat to IVF?

By Les Riley — The Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the US Supreme Court are in full swing. Already, she is being attacked as a threat to so-called abortion rights and “a danger to women who desperately want children”—a reference to her purported views on IVF. But is she a threat to infertile couples? And is the personhood movement an even bigger one?

Continue Reading

Trump picks Barrett: If Roe goes, then what?

By Personhood Alliance leadership — With President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, the jury is still out on whether she would help overturn Roe v. Wade. But we believe the bigger questions are: What would happen next, and why are we still waiting?

Continue Reading

Scroll to top