Originally published as part of The Way Forward series on the Educe blog, March 28, 2019, by Sarah Quale—What would it look like today if we became the fearless, cultural revolutionaries our Christian forefathers and mothers were? Would we need the unjust laws to change first? Could we actually make the destruction of human life and the human family unthinkable, even in the midst of widespread paganism?…
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.,—On Tuesday, March 26th, the Trump administration threw down the gauntlet on George Soros and the globalist abortion lobby when it announced that it would expand the Mexico City policy and start to implement the Siljander Amendment. This Amendment was put in place in 1981 to ensure no U.S. foreign aid would be used to lobby for abortion, but it was never implemented…until now.
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.— There is a false premise at the heart of the argument for morally compromised legislation. It is simply not true that rejecting the exceptions for the “difficult” cases means that we do nothing. Those of us who reject exception-laden legislation are often described as cutting off our nose to spite our face, tilting at windmills, making the perfect the enemy of the possible, etc. However, legislative agendas are never a binary choices. We don’t have to choose between cooperating with evil and our ultimate goal of the complete abolition of abortion.
WASHINGTON, DC, March 18, 2019; For immediate release—The Personhood Alliance board of directors voted unanimously on March 7, 2019, to accept the applications of new affiliates in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Nebraska, raising the number of its affiliate organizations to 19, with three more state applicants currently under consideration. “The Personhood Alliance is growing because we are unapologetic about our worldview and our goals,” says Personhood Alliance president Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq…
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq.— If this case is successful, Alabama could punish abortion clinics and pharmaceutical companies under its wrongful death law to prevent them from continuing to profit from the killing of pre-born children…
Published with permission from the Human Preservation blog, February 25, 2019, by Christopher M. Reilly—Time has run out for casual debates over the morality of human genetic editing…
By Sarah Quale, president of Personhood Alliance Education—In their zeal to protect “abortion access,” Democrats inadvertently forced a change in our national conversation that has cast a very unfavorable light on their position. Not only do these legislative efforts support infanticide, they expose a commonly misunderstood exception for abortion that we now have the opportunity to completely and unequivocally dismantle—the “life and health of the mother” argument…
By Arthur Goldberg, republished with permission—Abortion cannot be allowed on economic, social, or racial grounds—to afford a higher standard of living, for the convenience of uncommitted relationships, or because a minority racial group is involved.
For immediate release — Personhood Alliance affiliate, Personhood Alabama, filed suit today in the Circuit Court of Madison County to seek justice for “Baby Roe.” The lawsuit, brought by the father of Baby Roe, charges the Alabama Women’s Center in Huntsville, the abortionist, and the pharmaceutical company, with profiting from the wrongful death of his pre-born child, despite his active efforts to stop the abortion.
Published with permission from the Human Preservation blog, January 25, 2019, by Christopher M. Reilly — If we can edit the DNA of an embryo to potentially eliminate a genetic abnormality, “disease,” or disability, perhaps we can spare that human being from future suffering. How can any human being argue against that?… Here are ten arguments for resisting the impulse to exercise misguided compassion through genetic editing of human embryos.