Understanding Justice Alito’s Dissent to the Abortion Pill Ruling
US Supreme Court overrules Texas District Court judge, allows abortion pill to continue killing babies during appeals process.
Supreme Court
What is a person? History, law, and modern science
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — What is a person? We need an answer to the question of personhood for any intelligent discussion of abortion, because all human persons have a fundamental right to life.
Why Kansas’ Value Them Both Amendment failed and what to do about it
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — Even before the Dobbs decision, state-wide referendums on abortion have always attracted massive amounts of political donations from abortionists, as well as a barrage of pro-abortion unpaid propaganda from the mainstream media. As a result, things almost always turn out badly for the pro-life side. Case in point: The recent defeat of the Value Them Both Amendment in Kansas… It’s time to shift the tide.
Dobbs: Should the right to life be a political question?
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — Dobbs v. Jackson overturned Roe and Casey and sent abortion back to the states, but should the right to life be a political question?
The collapse of Roe v. Wade must unite us
By Gualberto Garcia Jones, Esq. — With the fall of Roe v. Wade imminent, it’s time to unite the fractured pro-life movement around its core principle—equal protection, without exception.
Draft Roe v Wade decision falls short
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — It is encouraging to hear that the Supreme Court, in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization, may finally overturn Roe v Wade. However, that will not be enough to protect the pre-born, because the Court’s decision just transfers the abortion issue to the states where, in many cases, abortion will be expanded.
Making sense of the COVID vaccine mandate hearing at SCOTUS
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate, through OSHA, conflicts with the fundamental structure of American government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in hearing oral arguments surrounding the vaccine mandate, is likely to address at least four main points against it.
Making sense of the COVID vaccine mandate hearing at SCOTUS
By David Bjornstrom, Esq. — President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate, through OSHA, conflicts with the fundamental structure of American government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in hearing oral arguments surrounding the vaccine mandate, is likely to address at least four main points against it.
Is Amy Coney Barrett a Threat to IVF?
By Les Riley — The Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the US Supreme Court are in full swing. Already, she is being attacked as a threat to so-called abortion rights and “a danger to women who desperately want children”—a reference to her purported views on IVF. But is she a threat to infertile couples? And is the personhood movement an even bigger one?
Trump picks Barrett: If Roe goes, then what?
By Personhood Alliance leadership — With President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, the jury is still out on whether she would help overturn Roe v. Wade. But we believe the bigger questions are: What would happen next, and why are we still waiting?
“Hawley Test” sets bar for Supreme Court and the pro-life movement
By AJ Dominque III — Missouri Senator Josh Hawley has set the bar that should be adopted for all Supreme Court justice nominees moving forward, and for all strategies to end legalized abortion at the federal, state, and local levels.
In the wake of June Medical v. Russo: A new strategy
By Matt Sande — The future of abortion jurisprudence in America is looking bleak for the foreseeable future. The pro-life strategy of placing statutory regulations on the abortion industry in hopes of prompting a Roe reversal appears to have reached its limit.
The June Medical v. Russo distraction
By Sarah Quale — As if there wasn’t enough injustice to go around right now, the US Supreme Court just handed conservatives another loss, as it struck down Louisiana’s hospital admitting privileges law in June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo. But as leaders in the pro-life movement express their anger and frustration at the court’s decision today, those of us on the ground need to stop and consider what we sought from this decision in the first place and whether the path that we’re on is a viable one.